If it is true that nature surrounds us constantly, responding to our actions in different ways and yet consistent with its internal logic, it is also true that often we happen to consider some natural phenomena as a kind of exception. In reality, "exception" is just a term we coined to resolve our inability to classify into the general order of things even what seems to go against the tide. Probably, as elaborate it might seem to us, our mathematical language is not in any way comparable to the natural one, and thus the nature of the system that surrounds us escapes from the understanding.
In a perfectly balanced equation, the calculation is developed and ends in an equivalence of opposites. This results in an acquittal, a balance that can not possibly exist in nature, since there is no life without movement, and thus is constantly disturbed by natural events.
These phenomena are therefore not to be reduced to mere "exceptions", but to the very core of the equation, which we are trying to solve since centuries, but never seems to be perfectly framed.
The impression at this point is then, that the brain is like a computer not powerful enough to expose the nature of the proposed calculation. We can perceive the logic behind it all, but never display it fully. We can simplify the mechanics, trying to control everything, but this is not the best direction to take. As infinitely larger vision nature has, there will be a re-elaboration that we could not foresee.
Until we continue to do static calculations, we will never understand how the earth maintains its balance, and we can then pursue it. Balance is something that changes constantly. It 'an active condition.


beplastik@gmail.com